NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M vs AMD FirePro V4900

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M and AMD FirePro V4900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
• Around 74% higher texture fill rate: 33.5 billion / sec vs 19.2 GTexel / s
• Around 5% better floating-point performance: 803.7 gflops vs 768.0 gflops
• Around 49% higher maximum memory size: 1526 MB vs 1 GB
• Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1746 vs 990
• 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6392 vs 1928
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.053 vs 6.303
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 588.645 vs 392.237
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.72 vs 0.597
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.916 vs 17.874
• Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2731 vs 1747
• Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2731 vs 1747

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V4900

• Around 34% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 598 MHz
• Around 43% higher pipelines: 480 vs 336
• 2.7x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1500 MHz
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 312 vs 303
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 72.818 vs 52.899
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3753 vs 3627
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7745 vs 3346
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3753 vs 3627
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7745 vs 3346

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro V4900

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1746 990
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	303 312
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6392 1928
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.053 6.303
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	588.645 392.237
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.72 0.597
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.916 17.874
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	52.899 72.818
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2731 1747
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3627 3753
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 7745
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2731 1747
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3627 3753
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 7745

Compare specifications (specs)