NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2000D and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
  • Around 60% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 598 MHz
  • Around 14% higher pipelines: 384 vs 336
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 47% lower typical power consumption: 51 Watt vs 75 Watt
  • Around 34% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1526 MB
  • 2.7x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1500 MHz
  • Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 406 vs 303
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 March 2013 vs 22 March 2012
Core clock speed 954 MHz vs 598 MHz
Pipelines 384 vs 336
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 51 Watt vs 75 Watt
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1526 MB
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz vs 1500 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 406 vs 303

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M

  • Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 33.5 billion / sec vs 30.53 GTexel / s
  • Around 10% better floating-point performance: 803.7 gflops vs 732.7 gflops
  • Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1746 vs 1586
  • Around 60% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6357 vs 3973
  • Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.053 vs 14.283
  • Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 588.645 vs 386.006
  • Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.72 vs 1.018
  • 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.916 vs 15.605
  • Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 52.899 vs 31.155
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2731 vs 2646
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3627 vs 3493
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2731 vs 2646
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3627 vs 3493
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 33.5 billion / sec vs 30.53 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 803.7 gflops vs 732.7 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1746 vs 1586
Geekbench - OpenCL 6357 vs 3973
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 15.053 vs 14.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 588.645 vs 386.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.72 vs 1.018
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 35.916 vs 15.605
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 52.899 vs 31.155
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2731 vs 2646
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3627 vs 3493
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346 vs 3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2731 vs 2646
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3627 vs 3493
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346 vs 3339

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1586
1746
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
406
303
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
3973
6357
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14.283
15.053
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
386.006
588.645
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.018
1.72
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15.605
35.916
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
31.155
52.899
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2646
2731
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3493
3627
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3339
3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2646
2731
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3493
3627
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3339
3346
Name NVIDIA Quadro K2000D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
PassMark - G3D Mark 1586 1746
PassMark - G2D Mark 406 303
Geekbench - OpenCL 3973 6357
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 14.283 15.053
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 386.006 588.645
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.018 1.72
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 15.605 35.916
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 31.155 52.899
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2646 2731
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3493 3627
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3339 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2646 2731
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3493 3627
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3339 3346
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2062

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M

Essentials

Architecture Kepler Fermi 2.0
Code name GK107 GF114
Launch date 1 March 2013 22 March 2012
Launch price (MSRP) $599
Place in performance rating 978 980
Price now $464
Type Workstation Laptop
Value for money (0-100) 4.14

Technical info

Core clock speed 954 MHz 598 MHz
Floating-point performance 732.7 gflops 803.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 384 336
Texture fill rate 30.53 GTexel / s 33.5 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 51 Watt 75 Watt
Transistor count 1,270 million 1,950 million
CUDA cores 336

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort No outputs
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)
Length 202 mm
Supplementary power connectors None
Bus support PCI Express 2.0
Laptop size large
SLI options 2-way

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12 API
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Vulkan
OpenCL 1.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1526 MB
Memory bandwidth 64 GB / s 72.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 192bit
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz 1500 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
FXAA
SLI