NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 38% higher core clock speed: 824 MHz vs 598 MHz
• Around 18% higher texture fill rate: 39.55 GTexel / s vs 33.5 billion / sec
• Around 71% higher pipelines: 576 vs 336
• Around 18% better floating-point performance: 949.2 gflops vs 803.7 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 2.7x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1500 MHz
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1877 vs 1737
• Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 430 vs 303

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M

• Around 49% higher maximum memory size: 1526 MB vs 1 GB
• Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6802 vs 5235
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.053 vs 13.806
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 588.645 vs 546.51
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.72 vs 1.535
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.916 vs 27.524
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 52.899 vs 38.664
• Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2731 vs 1435
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3627 vs 3531
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 3300
• Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2731 vs 1435
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3627 vs 3531
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 3300

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1877 1737
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	430 303
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5235 6802
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.806 15.053
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	546.51 588.645
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.535 1.72
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.524 35.916
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	38.664 52.899
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1435 2731
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3531 3627
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3300 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1435 2731
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3531 3627
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3300 3346

Compare specifications (specs)