NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 38% higher core clock speed: 824 MHz vs 598 MHz
- Around 18% higher texture fill rate: 39.55 GTexel / s vs 33.5 billion / sec
- Around 71% higher pipelines: 576 vs 336
- Around 18% better floating-point performance: 949.2 gflops vs 803.7 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2.7x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1882 vs 1746
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 431 vs 303
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 April 2013 vs 22 March 2012 |
Core clock speed | 824 MHz vs 598 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 39.55 GTexel / s vs 33.5 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 576 vs 336 |
Floating-point performance | 949.2 gflops vs 803.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1882 vs 1746 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 431 vs 303 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
- Around 49% higher maximum memory size: 1526 MB vs 1 GB
- Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6392 vs 5238
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.053 vs 13.806
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 588.645 vs 546.51
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.72 vs 1.535
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.916 vs 27.524
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 52.899 vs 38.664
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2731 vs 1435
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3627 vs 3531
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 3300
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2731 vs 1435
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3627 vs 3531
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 3300
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum memory size | 1526 MB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6392 vs 5238 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.053 vs 13.806 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 588.645 vs 546.51 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.72 vs 1.535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.916 vs 27.524 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 52.899 vs 38.664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2731 vs 1435 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3627 vs 3531 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3300 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2731 vs 1435 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3627 vs 3531 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3300 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1882 | 1746 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 431 | 303 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5238 | 6392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.806 | 15.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 546.51 | 588.645 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.535 | 1.72 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.524 | 35.916 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 38.664 | 52.899 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1435 | 2731 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3531 | 3627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3300 | 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1435 | 2731 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3531 | 3627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3300 | 3346 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2062 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | GK106 | GF114 |
Launch date | 22 April 2013 | 22 March 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 976 | 979 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 598 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 949.2 gflops | 803.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 576 | 336 |
Texture fill rate | 39.55 GTexel / s | 33.5 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,950 million |
CUDA cores | 336 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 147 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1526 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 72.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
SLI |