NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M and NVIDIA Quadro 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 17% higher core clock speed: 598 MHz vs 513 MHz
• Around 48% higher texture fill rate: 33.5 billion / sec vs 22.57 GTexel / s
• Around 11% better floating-point performance: 803.7 gflops vs 722.3 gflops
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 152 Watt
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 588.645 vs 511.131
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.916 vs 17.065
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 52.899 vs 46.591
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2731 vs 2602
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3627 vs 3104
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 3316
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2731 vs 2602
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3627 vs 3104
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 3316

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 5000

• Around 5% higher pipelines: 352 vs 336
• Around 68% higher maximum memory size: 2560 MB vs 1526 MB
• 2x more memory clock speed: 3000 MHz vs 1500 MHz
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1934 vs 1746
• Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 388 vs 303
• Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7358 vs 6392
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 16.451 vs 15.053
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.925 vs 1.72

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 5000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1746 1934
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	303 388
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6392 7358
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.053 16.451
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	588.645 511.131
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.72 1.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.916 17.065
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	52.899 46.591
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2731 2602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3627 3104
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3316
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2731 2602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3627 3104
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3316

Compare specifications (specs)