NVIDIA Tesla K10 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K10 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Tesla K10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K10

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
Around 25% higher core clock speed: 745 MHz vs 598 MHz
8.8x more texture fill rate: 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 33.5 billion / sec
9.1x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 336
5.7x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,289 gflops vs 803.7 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
5.4x more maximum memory size: 2x 4 GB vs 1526 MB
3.3x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1500 MHz
2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14029 vs 6392
2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.736 vs 15.053
Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 975.508 vs 588.645
Around 97% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.39 vs 1.72

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 May 2012 vs 22 March 2012
Core clock speed	745 MHz vs 598 MHz
Texture fill rate	2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 33.5 billion / sec
Pipelines	2x 1536 vs 336
Floating-point performance	2x 2,289 gflops vs 803.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size	2x 4 GB vs 1526 MB
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz vs 1500 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	14029 vs 6392
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	40.736 vs 15.053
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	975.508 vs 588.645
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.39 vs 1.72
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3632 vs 3627
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3632 vs 3627
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353 vs 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353 vs 3346

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M

3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 225 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 225 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K10
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

14029

6392

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

40.736

15.053

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

975.508

588.645

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.39

1.72

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3632

3627

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3632

3627

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3346

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3346

Name	NVIDIA Tesla K10	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
Geekbench - OpenCL	14029	6392
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	40.736	15.053
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	975.508	588.645
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.39	1.72
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3632	3627
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3632	3627
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353	3346
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353	3346
PassMark - G3D Mark		1746
PassMark - G2D Mark		303
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		35.916
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		52.899
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		2731
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		2731
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		2062

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Tesla K10	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi 2.0
Code name	GK104	GF114
Launch date	1 May 2012	22 March 2012
Launch price (MSRP)	$5,099
Place in performance rating	978	979
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Technical info
Core clock speed	745 MHz	598 MHz
Floating-point performance	2x 2,289 gflops	803.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	2x 1536	336
Texture fill rate	2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec	33.5 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	225 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	3,540 million	1,950 million
CUDA cores		336
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Length	272 mm
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Bus support		PCI Express 2.0
Laptop size		large
SLI options		2-way
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12 API
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL		1.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2x 4 GB	1526 MB
Memory bandwidth	2x 160.0 GB / s	72.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	2x 256 Bit	192bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
FXAA
SLI