NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M vs ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M and ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 165 Watt
- Around 49% higher maximum memory size: 1526 MB vs 2x 512 MB
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1745 vs 709
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 307 vs 224
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 March 2012 vs 26 January 2008 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 165 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1526 MB vs 2x 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1745 vs 709 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 vs 224 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3336 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Around 38% higher core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 598 MHz
- 6.4x more texture fill rate: 2x 13.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 33.5 billion / sec
- Around 90% higher pipelines: 2x 320 vs 336
- Around 31% better floating-point performance: 2x 528.0 gflops vs 803.7 gflops
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 1802 MHz vs 1500 MHz
Core clock speed | 825 MHz vs 598 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 2x 13.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 33.5 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2x 320 vs 336 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 528.0 gflops vs 803.7 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 1802 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M | ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1745 | 709 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 | 224 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6486 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.053 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 588.645 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.72 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.916 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 52.899 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2731 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3627 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2731 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3627 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3336 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2062 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M | ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | GF114 | R680 |
Launch date | 22 March 2012 | 26 January 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 943 | 946 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 598 MHz | 825 MHz |
CUDA cores | 336 | |
Floating-point performance | 803.7 gflops | 2x 528.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 336 | 2x 320 |
Texture fill rate | 33.5 billion / sec | 2x 13.2 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 165 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 666 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1526 MB | 2x 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 72.0 GB / s | 2x 57.7 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1802 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
SLI |