NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 33.5 billion / sec vs 31.2 billion / sec
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 336 vs 288
- Around 7% better floating-point performance: 803.7 gflops vs 748.8 gflops
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 49% higher maximum memory size: 1526 MB vs 1 GB
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6486 vs 6340
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.916 vs 24.476
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 52.899 vs 48.203
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3627 vs 3491
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 3108
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3627 vs 3491
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 3108
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 March 2012 vs 15 November 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 33.5 billion / sec vs 31.2 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 336 vs 288 |
Floating-point performance | 803.7 gflops vs 748.8 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1526 MB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6486 vs 6340 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.916 vs 24.476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 52.899 vs 48.203 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3627 vs 3491 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3108 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3627 vs 3491 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3108 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 598 MHz
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1986 vs 1745
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 360 vs 307
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.62 vs 15.053
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 635.018 vs 588.645
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.755 vs 1.72
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3044 vs 2731
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3044 vs 2731
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 598 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1986 vs 1745 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 360 vs 307 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.62 vs 15.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 635.018 vs 588.645 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.755 vs 1.72 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3044 vs 2731 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3044 vs 2731 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1745 | 1986 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 | 360 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6486 | 6340 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.053 | 18.62 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 588.645 | 635.018 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.72 | 1.755 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.916 | 24.476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 52.899 | 48.203 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2731 | 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3627 | 3491 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3108 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2731 | 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3627 | 3491 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3108 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2062 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GF114 | GF104 |
Launch date | 22 March 2012 | 15 November 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 943 | 944 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $160 | |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.95 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 598 MHz | 1300 MHz |
CUDA cores | 336 | 288 |
Floating-point performance | 803.7 gflops | 748.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 336 | 288 |
Texture fill rate | 33.5 billion / sec | 31.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,950 million |
Maximum GPU temperature | 104 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, 2 x Dual-Link DVI-I1 x Mini HDMI |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | 2-way |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1526 MB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72.0 GB / s | 108.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
SLI | ||
DSR | ||
Surround |