AMD Radeon R7 M370 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M370 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M370

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 51% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 598 MHz
• Around 14% higher pipelines: 384 vs 336
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.7x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1526 MB
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 676 vs 307
• Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7070 vs 6486
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 17.26 vs 15.053
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 70.174 vs 52.899

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M

• Around 45% higher texture fill rate: 33.5 billion / sec vs 23.04 GTexel / s
• Around 9% better floating-point performance: 803.7 gflops vs 737.3 gflops
• Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1745 vs 1418
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 588.645 vs 476.075
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.72 vs 1.653
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.916 vs 30.082
• Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2731 vs 1747
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3627 vs 1484
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 2449
• Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2731 vs 1747
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3627 vs 1484
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 2449

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M370
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1418 1745
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	676 307
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	7070 6486
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17.26 15.053
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	476.075 588.645
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.653 1.72
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.082 35.916
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	70.174 52.899
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1747 2731
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1484 3627
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2449 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1747 2731
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1484 3627
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2449 3346

Compare specifications (specs)