NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 3.2x more texture fill rate: 80.53 GTexel / s vs 24.8 billion / sec
- 7x more pipelines: 1344 vs 192
- 3.2x better floating-point performance: 1,933 gflops vs 595.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.656 vs 13.598
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.103 vs 1.227
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6514 vs 3275
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6700 vs 3341
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 April 2013 vs 30 May 2011 |
Texture fill rate | 80.53 GTexel / s vs 24.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1344 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 1,933 gflops vs 595.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.656 vs 13.598 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.103 vs 1.227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6514 vs 3275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6700 vs 3341 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 719 MHz
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 1 GB
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1857 vs 1543
- 71.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1857 vs 26.1
- 31.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3275 vs 105.1
- 27.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3341 vs 119.6
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 719 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1536 MB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1857 vs 1543 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1857 vs 26.1 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3275 vs 105.1 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 vs 119.6 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.656 | 13.598 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.103 | 1.227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1543 | 1857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26.1 | 1857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6514 | 3275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 105.1 | 3275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6700 | 3341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 119.6 | 3341 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1261 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 261 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4919 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 404.618 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.333 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 44.123 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | GK104 | GF116 |
Launch date | 1 April 2013 | 30 May 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1170 | 1173 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 719 MHz | 775 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,933 gflops | 595.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1344 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 80.53 GTexel / s | 24.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,170 million |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |