NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 720 MHz vs 675 MHz
- 4.3x more texture fill rate: 92.2 billion / sec vs 21.6 GTexel / s
- 4.8x more pipelines: 1536 vs 320
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 56% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 7.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3593 vs 463
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 440 vs 375
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 vs 2907
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 vs 2907
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 October 2012 vs 9 January 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 720 MHz vs 675 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion / sec vs 21.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 320 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3593 vs 463 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 440 vs 375 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 vs 2907 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 vs 2907 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
- 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 122 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 122 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3593 | 463 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 440 | 375 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12245 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.421 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 734.936 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.31 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.434 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 56.706 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5683 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3571 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 2907 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5683 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3571 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 2907 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
| Launch date | 23 October 2012 | 9 January 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 699 | 700 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Code name | M96 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 720 MHz | 675 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 320 |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion / sec | 21.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3540 Million | 514 million |
| Floating-point performance | 432.0 gflops | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | medium sized |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 10.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| FXAA | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| 1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI | ||
| 1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer) | ||
| DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600 | ||
| HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio) | ||
| PCI-E 2.0 x16 | ||
| Powerplay | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680MX vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6100 + nForce 430
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680MX vs
ATIMobility FireGL V5200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680MX vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4670
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680MX vs
AMDFirePro D500
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680MX vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680MX vs
AMDFirePro W5170M
