NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 6770M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM and AMD Radeon HD 6770M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 725 MHz
• Around 42% higher texture fill rate: 24.79 GTexel / s vs 17.4 GTexel / s
• Around 14% better floating-point performance: 793.3 gflops vs 696.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2135 vs 964
• 5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.117 vs 4.817
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 335.835 vs 234.842
• 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.651 vs 0.393
• Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.096 vs 15.475
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.126 vs 33.71

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6770M

• Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
• Around 57% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 55 Watt
• 2x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 vs 472
• Around 36% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8338 vs 6113
• Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3044 vs 1813
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 vs 3309
• Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3044 vs 1813
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 vs 3309

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6770M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2135 964
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	472 572
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6113 8338
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.117 4.817
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	335.835 234.842
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.651 0.393
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.096 15.475
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	97.126 33.71
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1813 3044
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3348
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1813 3044
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3348

Compare specifications (specs)