NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM vs AMD FirePro M5950
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM and AMD FirePro M5950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 725 MHz
- Around 42% higher texture fill rate: 24.79 GTexel / s vs 17.4 GTexel / s
- Around 14% better floating-point performance: 793.3 gflops vs 696.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2137 vs 1314
- 5.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6120 vs 1135
- 20.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.117 vs 1.199
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 335.835 vs 323.699
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.651 vs 0.535
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.096 vs 16.137
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.126 vs 66.638
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2918 vs 1528
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2918 vs 1528
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 February 2014 vs 4 January 2011 |
Core clock speed | 1033 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 24.79 GTexel / s vs 17.4 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 793.3 gflops vs 696.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2137 vs 1314 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6120 vs 1135 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.117 vs 1.199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 335.835 vs 323.699 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.651 vs 0.535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.096 vs 16.137 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.126 vs 66.638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2918 vs 1528 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2918 vs 1528 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M5950
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
- Around 57% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 55 Watt
- 2x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 574 vs 472
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2590 vs 1813
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 3309
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2590 vs 1813
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 3309
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 480 vs 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 55 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 574 vs 472 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2590 vs 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2590 vs 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3309 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M5950
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM | AMD FirePro M5950 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2137 | 1314 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 472 | 574 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6120 | 1135 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.117 | 1.199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 335.835 | 323.699 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.651 | 0.535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.096 | 16.137 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.126 | 66.638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2918 | 1528 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1813 | 2590 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2918 | 1528 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1813 | 2590 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3354 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 655 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM | AMD FirePro M5950 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GM107 | Whistler |
Launch date | 18 February 2014 | 4 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1004 | 1007 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 725 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 793.3 gflops | 696.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 480 |
Texture fill rate | 24.79 GTexel / s | 17.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 716 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | n / a | |
Form factor | MXM-A | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 57 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |