NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM vs AMD FirePro M5950

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM and AMD FirePro M5950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 725 MHz
• Around 42% higher texture fill rate: 24.79 GTexel / s vs 17.4 GTexel / s
• Around 14% better floating-point performance: 793.3 gflops vs 696.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2145 vs 1314
• 5.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6139 vs 1206
• 20.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.117 vs 1.199
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 335.835 vs 323.699
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.651 vs 0.535
• Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.096 vs 16.137
• Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.126 vs 66.638
• Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2918 vs 1528
• Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2918 vs 1528

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M5950

• Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
• Around 57% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 55 Watt
• 2x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 574 vs 474
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2590 vs 1813
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 3309
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2590 vs 1813
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 3309

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M5950

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2145 1314
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	474 574
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6139 1206
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.117 1.199
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	335.835 323.699
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.651 0.535
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.096 16.137
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	97.126 66.638
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2918 1528
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1813 2590
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2918 1528
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1813 2590
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3354

Compare specifications (specs)