NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P400

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 1033 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 83% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 55 Watt
• 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2875 vs 1813
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3328 vs 3309
• Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2875 vs 1813
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3328 vs 3309

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM

• Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 24.79 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
• Around 17% better floating-point performance: 793.3 gflops vs 679.9 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2138 vs 1645
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 471 vs 440
• 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6117 vs 3053
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.117 vs 19.856
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 335.835 vs 309.824
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.651 vs 1.38
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.096 vs 25.011
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.126 vs 84.489
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2918 vs 2709
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2918 vs 2709
• Around 6% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 655 vs 617

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1645 2138
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	440 471
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3053 6117
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.856 24.117
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	309.824 335.835
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.38 1.651
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.011 27.096
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	84.489 97.126
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2709 2918
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2875 1813
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3328 3309
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2709 2918
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2875 1813
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3328 3309
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	617 655

Compare specifications (specs)