NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 M275

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM and AMD Radeon R9 M275 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM

  • Around 15% higher core clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 900 MHz
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2139 vs 1115
  • Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 335.835 vs 313.463
  • Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1813 vs 1162
  • Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 1717
  • Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1813 vs 1162
  • Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 1717
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1033 MHz vs 900 MHz
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2139 vs 1115
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 335.835 vs 313.463
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1813 vs 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3309 vs 1717
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1813 vs 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3309 vs 1717

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M275

  • Around 49% higher texture fill rate: 37 GTexel / s vs 24.79 GTexel / s
  • Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
  • Around 49% better floating-point performance: 1,184 gflops vs 793.3 gflops
  • 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
  • Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 472
  • Around 51% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9231 vs 6117
  • Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.064 vs 24.117
  • Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.206 vs 1.651
  • Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.381 vs 27.096
  • Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 121.685 vs 97.126
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 37 GTexel / s vs 24.79 GTexel / s
Pipelines 640 vs 384
Floating-point performance 1,184 gflops vs 793.3 gflops
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 569 vs 472
Geekbench - OpenCL 9231 vs 6117
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 28.064 vs 24.117
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.206 vs 1.651
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 34.381 vs 27.096
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 121.685 vs 97.126

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M275

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2139
1115
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
472
569
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
6117
9231
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
24.117
28.064
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
335.835
313.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.651
2.206
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
27.096
34.381
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
97.126
121.685
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1813
1162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3309
1717
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1813
1162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3309
1717
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM AMD Radeon R9 M275
PassMark - G3D Mark 2139 1115
PassMark - G2D Mark 472 569
Geekbench - OpenCL 6117 9231
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 24.117 28.064
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 335.835 313.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.651 2.206
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 27.096 34.381
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 97.126 121.685
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2918
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1813 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3309 1717
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2918
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1813 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3309 1717
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 655

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM AMD Radeon R9 M275

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell GCN 1.0
Code name GM107 Venus
Launch date 18 February 2014 28 January 2014
Place in performance rating 1004 1005
Type Desktop Laptop
Launch price (MSRP) $799.99
Price now $699.99
Value for money (0-100) 3.01

Technical info

Core clock speed 1033 MHz 900 MHz
Floating-point performance 793.3 gflops 1,184 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 384 640
Texture fill rate 24.79 GTexel / s 37 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 55 Watt
Transistor count 1,870 million 1,500 million
Boost clock speed 925 MHz

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 145 mm
Supplementary power connectors None
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.6 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB / s 64 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 4000 MHz
Memory type DDR3 GDDR5
Shared memory 0