NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 980 MHz
• 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 140 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• 300x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.126 vs 62.69

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

• 3.2x more texture fill rate: 78.4 billion / sec vs 24.79 GTexel / s
• 2.5x more pipelines: 960 vs 384
• 2.5x better floating-point performance: 1,981 gflops vs 793.3 gflops
• Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4017 vs 2135
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 vs 475
• Around 86% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11364 vs 6108
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.505 vs 24.117
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 705.293 vs 335.835
• Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.085 vs 1.651
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.416 vs 27.096
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3581 vs 2918
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 vs 1813
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3365 vs 3309
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3581 vs 2918
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 vs 1813
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3365 vs 3309
• 2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1307 vs 655

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2135 4017
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	475 487
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6108 11364
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.117 30.505
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	335.835 705.293
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.651 3.085
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.096 35.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	97.126 62.69
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2918 3581
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1813 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3365
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2918 3581
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1813 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3365
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	655 1307

Compare specifications (specs)