NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 5% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1033 MHz versus 980 MHz
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 55 Watt versus 140 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 300x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.126 versus 62.69
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 versus 6 September 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1033 MHz versus 980 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt versus 140 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.126 versus 62.69 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 78.4 billion / sec versus 24.79 GTexel / s
- 2.5x plus de pipelines: 960 versus 384
- 2.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,981 gflops versus 793.3 gflops
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4017 versus 2135
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 versus 475
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11364 versus 6108
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.505 versus 24.117
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 705.293 versus 335.835
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.085 versus 1.651
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.416 versus 27.096
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3581 versus 2918
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 versus 1813
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3365 versus 3309
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3581 versus 2918
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 versus 1813
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3365 versus 3309
- 2x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1307 versus 655
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 78.4 billion / sec versus 24.79 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 960 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,981 gflops versus 793.3 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4017 versus 2135 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 versus 475 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11364 versus 6108 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.505 versus 24.117 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.293 versus 335.835 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.085 versus 1.651 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.416 versus 27.096 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3581 versus 2918 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 versus 1813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 versus 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3581 versus 2918 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 versus 1813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 versus 3309 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1307 versus 655 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2135 | 4017 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 475 | 487 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6108 | 11364 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.117 | 30.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 335.835 | 705.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.651 | 3.085 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.096 | 35.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.126 | 62.69 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2918 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1813 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2918 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1813 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3365 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 655 | 1307 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GM107 | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 | 6 September 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 979 | 740 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | |
| Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.35 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 1033 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 793.3 gflops | 1,981 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 960 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 24.79 GTexel / s | 78.4 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 140 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 2,540 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1033 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 960 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | One 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 745 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 745 OEM vs
ATIRadeon HD 2400 PRO
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 745 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 745 OEM vs
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 745 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX230
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 745 OEM vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 2
