NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM

• Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 1020 MHz
• Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 60 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• 360x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.096 vs 26.532
• 5.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 655 vs 117

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

• Around 75% higher texture fill rate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 24.79 GTexel / s
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
• Around 75% better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 793.3 gflops
• Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 2135
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 475
• Around 89% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 vs 6108
• Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 24.117
• Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 vs 335.835
• Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 vs 1.651
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 vs 97.126
• Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 2918
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 1813
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 3309
• Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 2918
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 1813
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 3309

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2135 3901
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	475 521
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6108 11526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.117 42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	335.835 642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.651 2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.096 26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	97.126 133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2918 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1813 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2918 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1813 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	655 117

Compare specifications (specs)