NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 800 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 254 Watt
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3900 vs 2534
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 517 vs 373
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11514 vs 3977
- 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 vs 0.789
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 February 2014 vs 19 September 2011 |
Core clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 254 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3900 vs 2534 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 517 vs 373 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11514 vs 3977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 vs 0.789 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2
- 5.5x more texture fill rate: 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 43.4 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 2x 960 vs 640
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 2x 1,536.0 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2x 2 GB vs 2 GB
- 840x more memory clock speed: 4200 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Texture fill rate | 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 43.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 960 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,536.0 gflops vs 1,389 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2x 2 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 4200 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3900 | 2534 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 517 | 373 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11514 | 3977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 | 0.789 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1268 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GM107 | Barts |
Launch date | 18 February 2014 | 19 September 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Place in performance rating | 712 | 713 |
Price now | $299.01 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.02 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | 800 MHz |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 2x 1,536.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 2x 960 |
Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s | 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 254 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2x 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB / s | 2x 134.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5.4 GB/s | 4200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |