NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
Around 29% higher texture fill rate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 33.6 billion / sec
5.7x more pipelines: 640 vs 112
4.1x better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 336.0 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
Around 75% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 105 Watt
4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
8.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 454
9.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 56
Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 2845
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 3304
Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 2845
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 3304

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 February 2014 vs 21 July 2008
Texture fill rate	43.4 GTexel / s vs 33.6 billion / sec
Pipelines	640 vs 112
Floating-point performance	1,389 gflops vs 336.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt vs 105 Watt
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3901 vs 454
PassMark - G2D Mark	521 vs 56
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3683 vs 2845
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3329 vs 3304
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3683 vs 2845
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3329 vs 3304

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT

Around 47% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1020 MHz
180x more memory clock speed: 900 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s

Core clock speed	1500 MHz vs 1020 MHz
Memory clock speed	900 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3901

454

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

521

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3683

2845

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3329

3304

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3683

2845

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3329

3304

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti	NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark	3901	454
PassMark - G2D Mark	521	56
Geekbench - OpenCL	11526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3683	2845
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3329	3304
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3683	2845
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3329	3304
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	117

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti	NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Tesla
Code name	GM107	G92
Launch date	18 February 2014	21 July 2008
Launch price (MSRP)	$149	$160
Place in performance rating	707	1063
Price now	$299.01	$103.99
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Value for money (0-100)	15.02	8.86
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1085 MHz
Core clock speed	1020 MHz	1500 MHz
CUDA cores	640	112
Floating-point performance	1,389 gflops	336.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	65 nm
Pipelines	640	112
Texture fill rate	43.4 GTexel / s	33.6 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt	105 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	754 million
Maximum GPU temperature		105 °C
Video outputs and ports
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	S / PDIF
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini...	2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	5.7" (14.5 cm)	9" (22.9 cm)
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 6-pin
SLI options		2-way
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	10.0
OpenGL	4.4	2.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	512 MB
Memory bandwidth	86.4 GB / s	57.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5.4 GB/s	900 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
TXAA
SLI