NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher texture fill rate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 33.9 billion / sec
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- Around 71% better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 812.5 gflops
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 64 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 1749
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 368
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 vs 4493
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 12.582
- Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 vs 364.463
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 vs 1.254
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.532 vs 18.386
- 5.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 vs 23.499
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 2663
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 3478
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 2663
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 3478
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 February 2014 vs 27 November 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s vs 33.9 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops vs 812.5 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 64 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 vs 1749 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 vs 368 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 vs 4493 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 vs 12.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 vs 364.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 vs 1.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 vs 18.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 vs 23.499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 vs 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 vs 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 vs 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 vs 3478 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 1020 MHz
- 4.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 545 vs 117
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 1020 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 vs 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 vs 3329 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 vs 117 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 | 1749 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 | 368 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 | 4493 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 | 12.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 | 364.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 | 1.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 | 18.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 | 23.499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 | 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 | 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | 3332 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 117 | 545 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | GM107 | GK106 |
Launch date | 18 February 2014 | 27 November 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | $109 |
Place in performance rating | 707 | 1003 |
Price now | $299.01 | $144.81 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.02 | 16.05 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | 1058 MHz |
CUDA cores | 640 | 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 812.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s | 33.9 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 64 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 2,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | Internal |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | 4.38" (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 5.70" (14.5 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | One 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB / s | 80.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128-bit GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 5.4 GB/s | 5.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA | ||
3D Blu-Ray |