NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 28% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 43.4 GTexel / s versus 33.9 billion / sec
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 384
- Environ 71% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,389 gflops versus 812.5 gflops
- Environ 7% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 64 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 versus 1749
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 versus 368
- 2.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 versus 4493
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 versus 12.582
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 versus 364.463
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 versus 1.254
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.532 versus 18.386
- 5.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 versus 23.499
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 versus 2663
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 versus 3478
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 versus 2663
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 versus 3478
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 versus 27 November 2013 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.4 GTexel / s versus 33.9 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,389 gflops versus 812.5 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt versus 64 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 versus 1749 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 versus 368 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 versus 4493 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 versus 12.582 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 versus 364.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 versus 1.254 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 versus 18.386 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 versus 23.499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 versus 2663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 versus 3478 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 versus 2663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 versus 3478 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- Environ 4% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1058 MHz versus 1020 MHz
- 4.7x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 545 versus 117
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz versus 1020 MHz |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 versus 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 versus 3329 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 versus 117 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 | 1749 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 | 368 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 | 4493 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 | 12.582 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 | 364.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 | 1.254 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 | 18.386 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 | 23.499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 | 2663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 3478 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | 3332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 | 2663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 3478 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | 3332 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 117 | 545 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GM107 | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 | 27 November 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | $109 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 707 | 1003 |
| Prix maintenant | $299.01 | $144.81 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.02 | 16.05 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz | 1058 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,389 gflops | 812.5 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.4 GTexel / s | 33.9 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 64 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 2,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | Internal |
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | 4.38" (11.1 cm) |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 5.70" (14.5 cm) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | One 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 86.4 GB / s | 80.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128-bit GDDR5 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5.4 GB/s | 5.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7150 + nForce 630i
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4670
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
AMDFirePro S7100X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
AMDRadeon Pro 555
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100
