NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 28% höhere Texturfüllrate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 33.9 billion / sec
- Etwa 67% höhere Leitungssysteme: 640 vs 384
- Etwa 71% bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 1,389 gflops vs 812.5 gflops
- Etwa 7% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 60 Watt vs 64 Watt
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 1749
- Etwa 42% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 368
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 vs 4493
- 3.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 12.582
- Etwa 76% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 vs 364.463
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 vs 1.254
- Etwa 44% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.532 vs 18.386
- 5.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 vs 23.499
- Etwa 82% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 2663
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 3478
- Etwa 82% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 2663
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 3478
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 18 February 2014 vs 27 November 2013 |
Texturfüllrate | 43.4 GTexel / s vs 33.9 billion / sec |
Leitungssysteme | 640 vs 384 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,389 gflops vs 812.5 gflops |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 64 Watt |
Maximale Speichergröße | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 vs 1749 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 vs 368 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 vs 4493 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 vs 12.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 vs 364.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 vs 1.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 vs 18.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 vs 23.499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 vs 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 vs 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 vs 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 vs 3478 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- Etwa 4% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1058 MHz vs 1020 MHz
- 4.7x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 545 vs 117
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1058 MHz vs 1020 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 vs 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 vs 3329 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 vs 117 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 | 1749 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 | 368 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 | 4493 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 | 12.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 | 364.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 | 1.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 | 18.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 | 23.499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 | 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 | 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | 3332 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 117 | 545 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Maxwell | Kepler |
Codename | GM107 | GK106 |
Startdatum | 18 February 2014 | 27 November 2013 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $149 | $109 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 707 | 1003 |
Jetzt kaufen | $299.01 | $144.81 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 15.02 | 16.05 |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1085 MHz | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1020 MHz | 1058 MHz |
CUDA-Kerne | 640 | 384 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,389 gflops | 812.5 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 640 | 384 |
Texturfüllrate | 43.4 GTexel / s | 33.9 billion / sec |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 60 Watt | 64 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 1,870 million | 2,540 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Audioeingang für HDMI | Internal | Internal |
Display-Anschlüsse | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximale VGA-Auflösung | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Multi-Monitor-Unterstützung | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Busunterstützung | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Höhe | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | 4.38" (11.1 cm) |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 5.70" (14.5 cm) |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | One 6-pin |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.3 |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 86.4 GB / s | 80.0 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | 128-bit GDDR5 |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 5.4 GB/s | 5.0 GB/s |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
Technologien |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA | ||
3D Blu-Ray |