NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 vs AMD Radeon HD 8970 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 and AMD Radeon HD 8970 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 4.5x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 vs 3583
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 vs 3583
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 February 2014 vs 8 January 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 vs 3583 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 vs 3583 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3339 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8970 OEM
- 3.4x more texture fill rate: 118.4 GTexel / s vs 34.72 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 2048 vs 512
- 3.4x better floating-point performance: 3,789 gflops vs 1,111 gflops
- 3x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 1 GB
- 1100x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
| Texture fill rate | 118.4 GTexel / s vs 34.72 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,789 gflops vs 1,111 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8970 OEM
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | AMD Radeon HD 8970 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3344 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 508 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9266 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.239 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 639.427 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.341 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.814 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4498 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | 3583 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4498 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | 3583 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3339 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1049 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | AMD Radeon HD 8970 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GM107 | Tahiti |
| Launch date | 18 February 2014 | 8 January 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $119 | |
| Place in performance rating | 755 | 756 |
| Price now | $150.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 27.54 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | 925 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 512 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,111 gflops | 3,789 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 2048 |
| Texture fill rate | 34.72 GTexel / s | 118.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 4,313 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 274 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 264.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5.0 GB/s | 5500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1700
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4770
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4290 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
NVIDIATesla C2070
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8970 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
NVIDIATesla K80m
