NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 823 MHz
- Around 36% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 797 MHz
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 122 Watt
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 515 vs 422
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32 vs 13.832
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 vs 3679
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 vs 3679
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 February 2014 vs 11 May 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 823 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz vs 797 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 122 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 515 vs 422 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32 vs 13.832 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 vs 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 vs 3679 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 102.0 GTexel / s vs 34.72 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 1536 vs 512
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 2,448 gflops vs 1,111 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 500x more memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3808 vs 3337
- Around 37% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12778 vs 9306
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.934 vs 34.239
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 705.616 vs 639.427
- Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.631 vs 2.341
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 78.867 vs 69.814
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4868 vs 4498
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4868 vs 4498
- Around 40% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1466 vs 1050
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 102.0 GTexel / s vs 34.72 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops vs 1,111 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3808 vs 3337 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12778 vs 9306 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.934 vs 34.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.616 vs 639.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 vs 2.341 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 78.867 vs 69.814 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4868 vs 4498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4868 vs 4498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3346 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1466 vs 1050 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3337 | 3808 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 515 | 422 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9306 | 12778 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.239 | 39.934 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 639.427 | 705.616 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.341 | 3.631 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32 | 13.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.814 | 78.867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4498 | 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4498 | 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1050 | 1466 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | GM107 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 18 February 2014 | 11 May 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $119 | |
| Place in performance rating | 724 | 725 |
| Price now | $150.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 27.54 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | 823 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 512 | 1536 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,111 gflops | 2,448 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 1536 |
| Texture fill rate | 34.72 GTexel / s | 102.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Laptop size | large | |
| SLI options | 1 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5.0 GB/s | 2500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
ATIFireGL V5100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6150
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1800
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8970 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8870M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M
