NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 8850M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM and AMD Radeon HD 8850M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 43% higher core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 575 MHz
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 888 MHz vs 725 MHz
- 3.4x more texture fill rate: 85.25 GTexel / s vs 25 GTexel / s
- Around 80% higher pipelines: 1152 vs 640
- 2.6x better floating-point performance: 2,046 gflops vs 800.0 gflops
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 2795
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 2795
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3323
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3323
- Around 59% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11808 vs 7447
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 June 2013 vs 1 April 2013 |
Core clock speed | 823 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 888 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 85.25 GTexel / s vs 25 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1152 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2,046 gflops vs 800.0 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 2795 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 2795 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3323 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3323 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11808 vs 7447 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8850M
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1536 MB
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1536 MB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8850M
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 8850M |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 2795 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 2795 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3323 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3323 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11808 | 7447 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1333 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 973 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 502 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.641 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 435.842 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.018 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.637 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.378 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2286 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2286 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 8850M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GK104 | Venus |
Launch date | 27 June 2013 | 1 April 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 940 | 941 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 888 MHz | 725 MHz |
Core clock speed | 823 MHz | 575 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,046 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1152 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 85.25 GTexel / s | 25 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,500 million |
Compute units | 10 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 134.4 GB / s | 32 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |