NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand and NVIDIA Quadro CX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 52% higher core clock speed: 915 MHz vs 602 MHz
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 109.8 GTexel / s vs 38.5 GTexel / s
- 7x more pipelines: 1344 vs 192
- 5.7x better floating-point performance: 2,634 gflops vs 462.3 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1536 MB
- 3.8x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 694 vs 454
- 5.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5427 vs 947
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 August 2013 vs 11 November 2008 |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz vs 602 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 109.8 GTexel / s vs 38.5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1344 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 2,634 gflops vs 462.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1536 MB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 694 vs 454 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5427 vs 947 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro CX
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 170 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro CX
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand | NVIDIA Quadro CX |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8276 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8276 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3627 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3627 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 694 | 454 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5427 | 947 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand | NVIDIA Quadro CX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GK104 | GT200B |
Launch date | 25 August 2013 | 11 November 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 314 | 317 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,999 | |
Price now | $149.95 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.20 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz | 602 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,634 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 1344 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 109.8 GTexel / s | 38.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB / s | 76.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |