NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 vs NVIDIA Quadro 500M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 and NVIDIA Quadro 500M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 8.4x more texture fill rate: 94.1 billion / sec vs 11.2 GTexel / s
- 12x more pipelines: 1152 vs 96
- 8.8x better floating-point performance: 2,378 gflops vs 268.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 8.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4792 vs 571
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 528 vs 365
- Around 64% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14304 vs 8743
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 June 2013 vs 22 February 2011 |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 94.1 billion / sec vs 11.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1152 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 2,378 gflops vs 268.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4792 vs 571 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 528 vs 365 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14304 vs 8743 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 500M
- 4.9x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 170 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 500M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | NVIDIA Quadro 500M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4792 | 571 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 528 | 365 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14304 | 8743 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.505 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.402 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.09 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.457 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.186 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6927 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6927 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1661 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | NVIDIA Quadro 500M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | GK104 | GF108 |
Launch date | 25 June 2013 | 22 February 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
Place in performance rating | 604 | 605 |
Price now | $249.99 | $275.14 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 23.69 | 3.18 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 700 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1152 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,378 gflops | 268.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 1152 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 94.1 billion / sec | 11.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
Minimum recommended system power | 500 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
PhysX | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |