NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 42.05 GTexel / s vs 31.2 billion / sec
- 2.7x more pipelines: 768 vs 288
- Around 35% better floating-point performance: 1,009 gflops vs 748.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.4x more memory clock speed: 4008 MHz vs 1700 MHz
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 384 vs 368
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 March 2014 vs 15 November 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 GTexel / s vs 31.2 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 768 vs 288 |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops vs 748.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz vs 1700 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 384 vs 368 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 628 MHz
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2011 vs 1226
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3491 vs 953
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3491 vs 953
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3108 vs 1552
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3108 vs 1552
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 628 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2011 vs 1226 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3491 vs 953 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3491 vs 953 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3108 vs 1552 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3108 vs 1552 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1226 | 2011 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 384 | 368 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 953 | 3491 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 953 | 3491 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1552 | 3108 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1552 | 3108 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6607 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.62 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 635.018 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.755 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.476 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 48.203 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3044 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3044 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | GK106 | GF104 |
Launch date | 17 March 2014 | 15 November 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 919 | 922 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $160 | |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.95 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 657 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 748.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 288 |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 GTexel / s | 31.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,950 million |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 104 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, 2 x Dual-Link DVI-I1 x Mini HDMI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB / s | 108.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |