NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
Around 1% higher core clock speed: 628 MHz vs 620 MHz
Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 42.05 GTexel / s vs 39.7 billion / sec
2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
Around 6% better floating-point performance: 1,009 gflops vs 952.3 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
Around 82% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 100 Watt
2.7x more memory clock speed: 4008 MHz vs 1500 MHz
Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 384 vs 349

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	17 March 2014 vs 28 June 2011
Core clock speed	628 MHz vs 620 MHz
Texture fill rate	42.05 GTexel / s vs 39.7 billion / sec
Pipelines	768 vs 384
Floating-point performance	1,009 gflops vs 952.3 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt vs 100 Watt
Memory clock speed	4008 MHz vs 1500 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	384 vs 349

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M

Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2074 vs 1226
3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3626 vs 953
3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3626 vs 953
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3318 vs 1552
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3318 vs 1552

Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2074 vs 1226
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3626 vs 953
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3626 vs 953
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3318 vs 1552
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3318 vs 1552

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1226

2074

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

384

349

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

953

3626

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

953

3626

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1552

3318

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1552

3318

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M
PassMark - G3D Mark	1226	2074
PassMark - G2D Mark	384	349
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	953	3626
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	953	3626
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1552	3318
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1552	3318
Geekbench - OpenCL		6389
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		24.415
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		690.98
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		1.83
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		29.702
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		67.215
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		2664
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		2664

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi 2.0
Code name	GK106	GF114
Launch date	17 March 2014	28 June 2011
Place in performance rating	918	920
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	657 MHz
Core clock speed	628 MHz	620 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,009 gflops	952.3 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	768	384
Texture fill rate	42.05 GTexel / s	39.7 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt	100 Watt
Transistor count	2,540 million	1,950 million
CUDA cores		384
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Bus support		PCI-E 2.0
Laptop size		large
SLI options		2-way
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12 API
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL		1.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	64.13 GB / s	96.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4008 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
CUDA
DirectX 11		DirectX 11
Optimus
SLI