NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A
- Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 42.05 GTexel / s vs 36.08 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
- Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 384 vs 225
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 GTexel / s vs 36.08 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 640 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 384 vs 225 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
- Around 14% better floating-point performance: 1,155 gflops vs 1,009 gflops
- Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 55 Watt
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2519 vs 1226
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 953
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 953
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 1552
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 1552
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,155 gflops vs 1,009 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 55 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2519 vs 1226 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 vs 953 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 vs 953 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 1552 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 1552 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1226 | 2519 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 384 | 225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 953 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 953 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1552 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1552 | 3353 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9754 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.761 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 388.248 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.428 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.889 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3817 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3817 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 979 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Code name | GK106 | GM107 |
| Launch date | 17 March 2014 | 12 March 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 917 | 918 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 657 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 628 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 1,155 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 GTexel / s | 36.08 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,870 million |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB / s | 80.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3 or GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760A vs
NVIDIAQuadro4 900 XGL
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760A vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder 9800 PRO
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760A vs
ATIRadeon HD 2400 XT
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760A vs
AMDFirePro W600
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760A vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760A vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX110
