NVIDIA GeForce MX110 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX110 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX110

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • Around 54% higher core clock speed: 965 MHz vs 628 MHz
  • Around 51% higher boost clock speed: 993 MHz vs 657 MHz
  • Around 83% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 55 Watt
  • Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4008 MHz
  • Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1436 vs 1226
  • 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3502 vs 953
  • 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3502 vs 953
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 1552
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 1552
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 17 November 2017 vs 17 March 2014
Core clock speed 965 MHz vs 628 MHz
Boost clock speed 993 MHz vs 657 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt vs 55 Watt
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz vs 4008 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1436 vs 1226
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3502 vs 953
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3502 vs 953
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3352 vs 1552
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3352 vs 1552

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A

  • Around 76% higher texture fill rate: 42.05 GTexel / s vs 23.83 GTexel / s
  • 3x more pipelines: 768 vs 256
  • Around 32% better floating-point performance: 1,009 gflops vs 762.6 gflops
  • 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 384 vs 189
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 42.05 GTexel / s vs 23.83 GTexel / s
Pipelines 768 vs 256
Floating-point performance 1,009 gflops vs 762.6 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 384 vs 189

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1436
1226
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
189
384
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3502
953
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3502
953
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3352
1552
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3352
1552
Name NVIDIA GeForce MX110 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A
PassMark - G3D Mark 1436 1226
PassMark - G2D Mark 189 384
Geekbench - OpenCL 4290
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2197
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2197
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3502 953
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3502 953
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3352 1552
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3352 1552

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce MX110 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell Kepler
Code name GM108 GK106
Launch date 17 November 2017 17 March 2014
Place in performance rating 911 914
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 993 MHz 657 MHz
Core clock speed 965 MHz 628 MHz
Floating-point performance 762.6 gflops 1,009 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 256 768
Texture fill rate 23.83 GTexel / s 42.05 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt 55 Watt
Transistor count 2,540 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 40.1 GB / s 64.13 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz 4008 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 / DDR3 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
GameWorks
Optimus
Verde Drivers