NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A
- Environ 17% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 42.05 GTexel / s versus 36.08 GTexel / s
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 768 versus 640
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 384 versus 225
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 42.05 GTexel / s versus 36.08 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 640 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 384 versus 225 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
- Environ 14% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,155 gflops versus 1,009 gflops
- Environ 22% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 55 Watt
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2519 versus 1226
- 3.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 versus 953
- 3.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 versus 953
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 versus 1552
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 versus 1552
| Caractéristiques | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,155 gflops versus 1,009 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 55 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2519 versus 1226 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 versus 953 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 versus 953 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 1552 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 1552 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1226 | 2519 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 384 | 225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 953 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 953 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1552 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1552 | 3353 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9754 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.761 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 388.248 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.428 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.889 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3817 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3817 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 979 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | GK106 | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 17 March 2014 | 12 March 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 917 | 918 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 657 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 628 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,009 gflops | 1,155 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 42.05 GTexel / s | 36.08 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | 1,870 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.13 GB / s | 80.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4008 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 or GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760A vs
NVIDIAQuadro4 900 XGL
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760A vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder 9800 PRO
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760A vs
ATIRadeon HD 2400 XT
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760A vs
AMDFirePro W600
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760A vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760A vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX110
