NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M vs ATI Radeon 9550

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M and ATI Radeon 9550 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• 2.6x more core clock speed: 657 MHz vs 250 MHz
• 42.1x more texture fill rate: 42.05 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 130 nm
• 32x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 64 MB
• 5x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 400 MHz
• 49.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1729 vs 35
• Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 234 vs 145

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9550

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1729 35
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	234 145

Compare specifications (specs)