AMD FirePro W5130M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W5130M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5130M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 37% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 657 MHz
• Around 41% higher boost clock speed: 925 MHz vs 657 MHz
• 2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 301 vs 234
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.588 vs 15.673
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.885 vs 1.512
• Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 89.784 vs 53.992

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

• Around 42% higher texture fill rate: 42.05 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
• Around 7% better floating-point performance: 1,009 gflops vs 947.2 gflops
• Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1729 vs 1410
• Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5592 vs 5198
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 509.958 vs 505.57
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.422 vs 30.114
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2836 vs 1879
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2728 vs 2090
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 2582
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2836 vs 1879
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2728 vs 2090
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 2582

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro W5130M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1410 1729
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	301 234
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5198 5592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.588 15.673
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	505.57 509.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.885 1.512
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.114 30.422
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	89.784 53.992
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1879 2836
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2090 2728
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2582 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1879 2836
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2090 2728
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2582 3333

Compare specifications (specs)