NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 and AMD Radeon HD 7950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher texture fill rate: 134 billion / sec vs 89.6 GTexel / s
- Around 16% better floating-point performance: 3,333 gflops vs 2,867 gflops
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 5.6x more memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 12% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2136 vs 1914
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 May 2013 vs 31 January 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 134 billion / sec vs 89.6 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 3,333 gflops vs 2,867 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2136 vs 1914 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7950
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1085 MHz
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1536
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
- 4.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 82144 vs 17952
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 63.74 vs 49.824
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1177.395 vs 1089.67
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.685 vs 4.899
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 69.23 vs 44.06
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 343.81 vs 103.884
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7988 vs 7412
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3340
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7988 vs 7412
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3340
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 1085 MHz |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 1536 |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 82144 vs 17952 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 63.74 vs 49.824 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1177.395 vs 1089.67 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.685 vs 4.899 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 69.23 vs 44.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 343.81 vs 103.884 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7988 vs 7412 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 vs 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7988 vs 7412 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 vs 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3340 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7950
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 | AMD Radeon HD 7950 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5918 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 560 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17952 | 82144 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.824 | 63.74 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1089.67 | 1177.395 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.899 | 5.685 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.06 | 69.23 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.884 | 343.81 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7412 | 7988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7412 | 7988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2136 | 1914 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 | AMD Radeon HD 7950 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GK104 | Tahiti |
Launch date | 30 May 2013 | 31 January 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $449 |
Place in performance rating | 534 | 536 |
Price now | $449.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.45 | |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1046 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,333 gflops | 2,867 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1792 |
Texture fill rate | 134 billion / sec | 89.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 4,313 million |
Compute units | 28 | |
Stream Processors | 1792 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 267 mm |
Minimum recommended system power | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.3 GB / s | 240 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
PhysX | ||
TXAA | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
ZeroCore |