NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 versus AMD Radeon HD 7950
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 and AMD Radeon HD 7950 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 50% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 134 billion / sec versus 89.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 16% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,333 gflops versus 2,867 gflops
- Environ 30% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 230 Watt versus 300 Watt
- 5.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7012 MHz versus 1250 MHz
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2136 versus 1914
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 30 May 2013 versus 31 January 2012 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 134 billion / sec versus 89.6 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,333 gflops versus 2,867 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt versus 300 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7012 MHz versus 1250 MHz |
| Référence | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2136 versus 1914 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7950
- Environ 15% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1250 MHz versus 1085 MHz
- Environ 17% de pipelines plus haut: 1792 versus 1536
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 3 GB versus 2 GB
- 4.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 82144 versus 17952
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 63.74 versus 49.824
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1177.395 versus 1089.67
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.685 versus 4.899
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 69.23 versus 44.06
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 343.81 versus 103.884
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7988 versus 7412
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 3340
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7988 versus 7412
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 3340
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz versus 1085 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1792 versus 1536 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 3 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 82144 versus 17952 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 63.74 versus 49.824 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1177.395 versus 1089.67 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.685 versus 4.899 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 69.23 versus 44.06 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 343.81 versus 103.884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7988 versus 7412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 versus 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7988 versus 7412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 versus 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3340 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7950
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 | AMD Radeon HD 7950 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5918 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 560 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17952 | 82144 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.824 | 63.74 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1089.67 | 1177.395 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.899 | 5.685 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.06 | 69.23 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.884 | 343.81 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7412 | 7988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7412 | 7988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2136 | 1914 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 | AMD Radeon HD 7950 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GK104 | Tahiti |
| Date de sortie | 30 May 2013 | 31 January 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $449 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 534 | 536 |
| Prix maintenant | $449.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.45 | |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1046 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,333 gflops | 2,867 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 1792 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 134 billion / sec | 89.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 4,313 million |
| Unités de Compute | 28 | |
| Stream Processors | 1792 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 267 mm |
| Énergie du systeme minimum recommandé | 600 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 224.3 GB / s | 240 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7012 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| PhysX | ||
| TXAA | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3870
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7950
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7850
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770 vs
NVIDIATesla K40c
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P1000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770 vs
AMDRadeon RX 560
