NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 1046 MHz
• Around 36% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1085 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 4.9x lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 230 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 596 vs 559
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 71.86 vs 49.824
• Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.117 vs 44.06
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 245.081 vs 103.884

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770

• 2.3x more texture fill rate: 134 billion / sec vs 59.2 GTexel / s
• 3x more pipelines: 1536 vs 512
• Around 76% better floating-point performance: 3,333 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
• Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 5012 MHz
• Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5913 vs 4465
• Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17946 vs 15667
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1089.67 vs 832.248
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.899 vs 4.039
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7412 vs 6796
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7412 vs 6796
• Around 34% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2136 vs 1591

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4465 5913
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	596 559
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	15667 17946
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	71.86 49.824
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	832.248 1089.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.039 4.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	65.117 44.06
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	245.081 103.884
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6796 7412
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3702 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3348 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6796 7412
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3702 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3348 3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1591 2136

Compare specifications (specs)