NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1046 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 980 MHz
- Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 134 billion / sec vs 102.5 billion / sec
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1344
- Around 36% better floating-point performance: 3,333 gflops vs 2,459.5 gflops
- 1168.7x more memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5939 vs 4413
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 562 vs 468
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18068 vs 15375
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.824 vs 36.256
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1089.67 vs 1029.267
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.899 vs 3.037
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 103.884 vs 82.191
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7412 vs 3285
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7412 vs 3285
- Around 33% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2155 vs 1615
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 May 2013 vs 16 August 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1046 MHz vs 915 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 134 billion / sec vs 102.5 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 1344 |
Floating-point performance | 3,333 gflops vs 2,459.5 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5939 vs 4413 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 562 vs 468 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18068 vs 15375 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.824 vs 36.256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1089.67 vs 1029.267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.899 vs 3.037 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.884 vs 82.191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7412 vs 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 vs 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 3337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7412 vs 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 vs 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 3337 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2155 vs 1615 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
- Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 230 Watt
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.894 vs 44.06
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 230 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.894 vs 44.06 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5939 | 4413 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 562 | 468 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18068 | 15375 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.824 | 36.256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1089.67 | 1029.267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.899 | 3.037 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.06 | 45.894 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.884 | 82.191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7412 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7412 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3337 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2155 | 1615 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | GK104 | GK104 |
Launch date | 30 May 2013 | 16 August 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $299 |
Place in performance rating | 515 | 701 |
Price now | $449.99 | $321.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.45 | 17.34 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | 980 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1046 MHz | 915 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1536 | 1344 |
Floating-point performance | 3,333 gflops | 2,459.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1344 |
Texture fill rate | 134 billion / sec | 102.5 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | Internal |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
Minimum recommended system power | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | Two 6-pin |
SLI options | 3-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.3 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
PhysX | ||
TXAA | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
SLI |