NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 90% higher core clock speed: 1046 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 60.9x more texture fill rate: 134 billion / sec vs 2.2 GTexel / s
- 192x more pipelines: 1536 vs 8
- 148.8x better floating-point performance: 3,333 gflops vs 22.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- 5.8x more memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 63.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5939 vs 93
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 562 vs 334
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 May 2013 vs 15 August 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1046 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 134 billion / sec vs 2.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 3,333 gflops vs 22.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5939 vs 93 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 562 vs 334 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
- 11.5x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 230 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 230 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5939 | 93 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 562 | 334 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18068 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.824 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1089.67 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.899 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.06 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.884 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7412 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7412 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2155 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Tesla |
Code name | GK104 | G98 |
Launch date | 30 May 2013 | 15 August 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Place in performance rating | 515 | 516 |
Price now | $449.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.45 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1046 MHz | 550 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,333 gflops | 22.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Pipelines | 1536 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 134 billion / sec | 2.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Minimum recommended system power | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.3 GB / s | 9.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
PhysX | ||
TXAA |