NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 14% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1046 MHz versus 915 MHz
- Environ 11% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1085 MHz versus 980 MHz
- Environ 31% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 134 billion / sec versus 102.5 billion / sec
- Environ 14% de pipelines plus haut: 1536 versus 1344
- Environ 36% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,333 gflops versus 2,459.5 gflops
- 1168.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7012 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5939 versus 4413
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 562 versus 468
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 18068 versus 15375
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.824 versus 36.256
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1089.67 versus 1029.267
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.899 versus 3.037
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 103.884 versus 82.191
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7412 versus 3285
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7412 versus 3285
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2155 versus 1615
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 30 May 2013 versus 16 August 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1046 MHz versus 915 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz versus 980 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 134 billion / sec versus 102.5 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1536 versus 1344 |
Performance á point flottant | 3,333 gflops versus 2,459.5 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7012 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5939 versus 4413 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 562 versus 468 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18068 versus 15375 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.824 versus 36.256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1089.67 versus 1029.267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.899 versus 3.037 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.884 versus 82.191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7412 versus 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 versus 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 versus 3337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7412 versus 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 versus 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 versus 3337 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2155 versus 1615 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
- Environ 53% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 230 Watt
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.894 versus 44.06
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 230 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.894 versus 44.06 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5939 | 4413 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 562 | 468 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18068 | 15375 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.824 | 36.256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1089.67 | 1029.267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.899 | 3.037 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.06 | 45.894 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.884 | 82.191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7412 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7412 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3337 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2155 | 1615 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Nom de code | GK104 | GK104 |
Date de sortie | 30 May 2013 | 16 August 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $299 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 515 | 701 |
Prix maintenant | $449.99 | $321.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.45 | 17.34 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz | 980 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1046 MHz | 915 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | 1344 |
Performance á point flottant | 3,333 gflops | 2,459.5 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1344 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 134 billion / sec | 102.5 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 150 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | Internal |
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
Énergie du systeme minimum recommandé | 600 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | Two 6-pin |
Options SLI | 3-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 224.3 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7012 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
PhysX | ||
TXAA | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
SLI |