NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs AMD Radeon HD 7690M XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti and AMD Radeon HD 7690M XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 875 MHz vs 725 MHz
- 12.1x more texture fill rate: 210 billion / sec vs 17.4 GTexel / s
- 6x more pipelines: 2880 vs 480
- 7.7x better floating-point performance: 5,345 gflops vs 696.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
- 9.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9510 vs 1009
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 635 vs 552
- 3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28344 vs 8800
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 November 2013 vs 7 January 2013 |
Core clock speed | 875 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 210 billion / sec vs 17.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2880 vs 480 |
Floating-point performance | 5,345 gflops vs 696.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9510 vs 1009 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 635 vs 552 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28344 vs 8800 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7690M XT
- 10x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 514.3x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7690M XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti | AMD Radeon HD 7690M XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9510 | 1009 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 635 | 552 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28344 | 8800 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.429 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2001.15 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.854 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.067 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 182.11 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10021 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10021 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3390 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti | AMD Radeon HD 7690M XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Terascale 2 |
Code name | GK110B | Thames |
Launch date | 7 November 2013 | 7 January 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Place in performance rating | 399 | 400 |
Price now | $749.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.80 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 928 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 875 MHz | 725 MHz |
CUDA cores | 2880 | |
Floating-point performance | 5,345 gflops | 696.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 2880 | 480 |
Texture fill rate | 210 billion / sec | 17.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 716 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 336 GB / s | 57.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |