AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W8100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W8100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 220 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 3 GB
- 714.3x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 723 vs 632
- Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34705 vs 28360
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 93.339 vs 75.429
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2333.922 vs 2001.15
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.816 vs 6.854
- Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 112.45 vs 58.067
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 440.107 vs 182.11
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 June 2014 vs 7 November 2013 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 3 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 723 vs 632 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34705 vs 28360 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 93.339 vs 75.429 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2333.922 vs 2001.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.816 vs 6.854 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 112.45 vs 58.067 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 440.107 vs 182.11 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 3342 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 875 MHz vs 824 MHz
- Around 59% higher texture fill rate: 210 billion / sec vs 131.8 GTexel / s
- Around 13% higher pipelines: 2880 vs 2560
- Around 27% better floating-point performance: 5,345 gflops vs 4,219 gflops
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9457 vs 6672
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10021 vs 5494
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10021 vs 5494
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 875 MHz vs 824 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 210 billion / sec vs 131.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2880 vs 2560 |
| Floating-point performance | 5,345 gflops vs 4,219 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9457 vs 6672 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10021 vs 5494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10021 vs 5494 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W8100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD FirePro W8100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6672 | 9457 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 723 | 632 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34705 | 28360 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 93.339 | 75.429 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2333.922 | 2001.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.816 | 6.854 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 112.45 | 58.067 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 440.107 | 182.11 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5494 | 10021 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5494 | 10021 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3342 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3390 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD FirePro W8100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Hawaii | GK110B |
| Launch date | 23 June 2014 | 7 November 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 392 | 393 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
| Price now | $749.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 14.80 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 875 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | 5,345 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2880 |
| Texture fill rate | 131.8 GTexel / s | 210 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6,200 million | 7,080 million |
| Boost clock speed | 928 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 2880 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HD сomponent video output | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 279 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 320 GB / s | 336 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
