NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300 SE
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 and NVIDIA GeForce 9300 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 60% higher core clock speed: 863 MHz vs 540 MHz
- 37.2x more texture fill rate: 160.5 billion / sec vs 4.32 GTexel / s
- 288x more pipelines: 2304 vs 8
- 199.8x better floating-point performance: 4,156 gflops vs 20.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 12x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 256 MB
- 7.5x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 97.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8011 vs 82
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 590 vs 344
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 May 2013 vs 1 June 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 863 MHz vs 540 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 160.5 billion / sec vs 4.32 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 8 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,156 gflops vs 20.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 256 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8011 vs 82 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 vs 344 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9300 SE
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 | NVIDIA GeForce 9300 SE |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8011 | 82 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 | 344 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 23385 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 57.735 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1269.688 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.505 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.407 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 174.323 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9064 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9064 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2779 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 | NVIDIA GeForce 9300 SE | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla |
| Code name | GK110 | G98 |
| Launch date | 23 May 2013 | 1 June 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
| Place in performance rating | 461 | 464 |
| Price now | $740.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 12.94 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 863 MHz | 540 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 2304 | |
| Floating-point performance | 4,156 gflops | 20.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 8 |
| Texture fill rate | 160.5 billion / sec | 4.32 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 7,080 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Minimum recommended system power | 600 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| PhysX | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 vs
ATIRadeon X700 SE
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9300 SE
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M470X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5200 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 vs
AppleM2 Pro 16-core
