AMD Radeon R9 M395X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M395X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M395X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 733 vs 587
- Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27734 vs 23205
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.367 vs 57.735
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.718 vs 5.505
- Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 71.057 vs 37.407
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 413.329 vs 174.323
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 23 May 2013 |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 733 vs 587 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27734 vs 23205 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.367 vs 57.735 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.718 vs 5.505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 71.057 vs 37.407 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 413.329 vs 174.323 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 863 MHz vs 723 MHz
- Around 73% higher texture fill rate: 160.5 billion / sec vs 92.54 GTexel / s
- Around 13% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 2048
- Around 40% better floating-point performance: 4,156 gflops vs 2,961 gflops
- 4.8x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8011 vs 5195
- Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1269.688 vs 799.421
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9064 vs 7365
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 2154
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9064 vs 7365
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 2154
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 863 MHz vs 723 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 160.5 billion / sec vs 92.54 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 2048 |
Floating-point performance | 4,156 gflops vs 2,961 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8011 vs 5195 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1269.688 vs 799.421 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9064 vs 7365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 2154 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9064 vs 7365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 2154 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3354 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M395X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M395X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5195 | 8011 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 733 | 587 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27734 | 23205 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.367 | 57.735 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.421 | 1269.688 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.718 | 5.505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 71.057 | 37.407 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 413.329 | 174.323 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7365 | 9064 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2154 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7365 | 9064 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2154 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2797 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M395X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Amethyst | GK110 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 23 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 467 | 468 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Price now | $740.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 12.94 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 863 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 4,156 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2304 |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 GTexel / s | 160.5 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 7,080 million |
Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 2304 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Eyefinity | ||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Minimum recommended system power | 600 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 288.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
TrueAudio | ||
ZeroCore | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
PhysX | ||
TXAA |