AMD Radeon R9 M395X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M395X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M395X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 733 vs 590
- Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27710 vs 24011
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.367 vs 57.735
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.718 vs 5.505
- Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 71.057 vs 37.407
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 413.329 vs 174.323
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 23 May 2013 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 733 vs 590 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 27710 vs 24011 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.367 vs 57.735 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.718 vs 5.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 71.057 vs 37.407 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 413.329 vs 174.323 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 863 MHz vs 723 MHz
- Around 73% higher texture fill rate: 160.5 billion / sec vs 92.54 GTexel / s
- Around 13% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 2048
- Around 40% better floating-point performance: 4,156 gflops vs 2,961 gflops
- 4.8x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8009 vs 5195
- Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1269.688 vs 799.421
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9064 vs 7365
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 2154
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9064 vs 7365
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 2154
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 863 MHz vs 723 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 160.5 billion / sec vs 92.54 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 2048 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,156 gflops vs 2,961 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8009 vs 5195 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1269.688 vs 799.421 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9064 vs 7365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 2154 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9064 vs 7365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 2154 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3354 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M395X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 M395X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5195 | 8009 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 733 | 590 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 27710 | 24011 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.367 | 57.735 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.421 | 1269.688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.718 | 5.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 71.057 | 37.407 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 413.329 | 174.323 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7365 | 9064 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2154 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7365 | 9064 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2154 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2780 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 M395X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Amethyst | GK110 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 23 May 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 454 | 456 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
| Price now | $740.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 12.94 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 863 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 4,156 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 2304 |
| Texture fill rate | 92.54 GTexel / s | 160.5 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 7,080 million |
| Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 2304 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Eyefinity | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Minimum recommended system power | 600 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 288.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| PhysX | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 M395X with others
AMDRadeon R9 M395X vs
ATIFireGL V5200
AMDRadeon R9 M395X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780
AMDRadeon R9 M395X vs
AMDRadeon R7 A265
AMDRadeon R9 M395X vs
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Max-Q
AMDRadeon R9 M395X vs
IntelUHD Graphics P750
AMDRadeon R9 M395X vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX550
