NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M vs AMD Radeon HD 8970 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M and AMD Radeon HD 8970 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 122 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3679 vs 3583
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3679 vs 3583
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 11 May 2013 vs 8 January 2013 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3679 vs 3583 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3679 vs 3583 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3339 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8970 OEM
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 823 MHz
- Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 118.4 GTexel / s vs 102.0 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1536
- Around 55% better floating-point performance: 3,789 gflops vs 2,448 gflops
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 2500 MHz
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 823 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 118.4 GTexel / s vs 102.0 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 1536 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,789 gflops vs 2,448 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 2500 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8970 OEM
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | AMD Radeon HD 8970 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3808 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 422 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12778 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.934 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.616 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.832 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 78.867 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4868 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3679 | 3583 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4868 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3679 | 3583 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3339 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1466 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | AMD Radeon HD 8970 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GK104 | Tahiti |
| Launch date | 11 May 2013 | 8 January 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 725 | 727 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 797 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 823 MHz | 925 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops | 3,789 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 2048 |
| Texture fill rate | 102.0 GTexel / s | 118.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 4,313 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| SLI options | 1 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 274 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 264.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 5500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
ATIFireGL V5100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6150
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 140 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8970 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8870M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750
