NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M vs ATI Radeon HD 4770
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M and ATI Radeon HD 4770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 750 MHz
- 4.3x more texture fill rate: 102.0 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 640
- 2.6x better floating-point performance: 2,448 gflops vs 960.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- 4.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3811 vs 893
- 4.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 423 vs 101
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 11 May 2013 vs 28 April 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 823 MHz vs 750 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 102.0 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 640 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops vs 960.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3811 vs 893 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 423 vs 101 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4770
- Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 122 Watt
- Around 28% higher memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 2500 MHz
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8618 vs 3351
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8618 vs 3351
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 122 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 2500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8618 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8618 vs 3351 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4770
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | ATI Radeon HD 4770 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3811 | 893 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 423 | 101 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12879 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.934 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.616 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.832 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 78.867 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4868 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3679 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 8618 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4868 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3679 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 8618 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1466 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | ATI Radeon HD 4770 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
| Code name | GK104 | RV740 |
| Launch date | 11 May 2013 | 28 April 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 765 | 767 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 797 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 823 MHz | 750 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops | 960.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 102.0 GTexel / s | 24 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 826 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| SLI options | 1 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 203 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 10.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4650
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
ATIRadeon HD 4770
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
ATIRadeon HD 5850
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
NVIDIAGRID K520
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
AMDRadeon E8950
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M470
