NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 170 Watt
- Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 151.016 vs 86.208
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 vs 10 May 2012 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 170 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 vs 86.208 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
- 2.8x more texture fill rate: 102.5 billion / sec vs 36.08 GTexel / s
- 2.1x more pipelines: 1344 vs 640
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 2,459.5 gflops vs 1,155 gflops
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5345 vs 2521
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 537 vs 225
- Around 58% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15511 vs 9809
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.613 vs 37.761
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 971.208 vs 388.248
- Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.281 vs 2.428
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.404 vs 38.889
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7038 vs 3817
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7038 vs 3817
- Around 88% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1839 vs 979
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 102.5 billion / sec vs 36.08 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1344 vs 640 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,459.5 gflops vs 1,155 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5345 vs 2521 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 537 vs 225 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15511 vs 9809 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.613 vs 37.761 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 971.208 vs 388.248 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.281 vs 2.428 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.404 vs 38.889 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7038 vs 3817 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 vs 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7038 vs 3817 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 vs 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1839 vs 979 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2521 | 5345 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 | 537 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9809 | 15511 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.761 | 41.613 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 388.248 | 971.208 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.428 | 4.281 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.889 | 40.404 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 | 86.208 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3817 | 7038 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3817 | 7038 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3361 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 979 | 1839 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | GM107 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 | 10 May 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 896 | 554 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Price now | $474.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.20 | |
Technical info |
||
| CUDA cores | 640 | 1344 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,155 gflops | 2,459.5 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1344 |
| Texture fill rate | 36.08 GTexel / s | 102.5 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
| Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | 3-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB / s | 192.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256-bit GDDR5 |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3 or GDDR5 | |
| Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7800 GS AGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
ATIRadeon HD 3300 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 810A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M375X
