NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 10 mois plus tard
- 3.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 170 Watt
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 151.016 versus 86.208
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 versus 10 May 2012 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 170 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 versus 86.208 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 102.5 billion / sec versus 36.08 GTexel / s
- 2.1x plus de pipelines: 1344 versus 640
- 2.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,459.5 gflops versus 1,155 gflops
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5345 versus 2521
- 2.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 537 versus 225
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 15511 versus 9809
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.613 versus 37.761
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 971.208 versus 388.248
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.281 versus 2.428
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.404 versus 38.889
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7038 versus 3817
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7038 versus 3817
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1839 versus 979
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 102.5 billion / sec versus 36.08 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1344 versus 640 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,459.5 gflops versus 1,155 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5345 versus 2521 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 537 versus 225 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15511 versus 9809 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.613 versus 37.761 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 971.208 versus 388.248 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.281 versus 2.428 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.404 versus 38.889 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7038 versus 3817 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 versus 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 versus 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7038 versus 3817 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 versus 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 versus 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1839 versus 979 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2521 | 5345 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 | 537 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9809 | 15511 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.761 | 41.613 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 388.248 | 971.208 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.428 | 4.281 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.889 | 40.404 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 | 86.208 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3817 | 7038 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3817 | 7038 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3361 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 979 | 1839 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GM107 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 | 10 May 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 896 | 554 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Prix maintenant | $474.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.20 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | 1344 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,155 gflops | 2,459.5 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1344 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 36.08 GTexel / s | 102.5 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 980 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Options SLI | 3-way | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | Two 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.0 GB / s | 192.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256-bit GDDR5 |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 or GDDR5 | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6.0 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7800 GS AGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
ATIRadeon HD 3300 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 810A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M375X
