NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M vs ATI Radeon HD 4200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M and ATI Radeon HD 4200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 59% higher core clock speed: 797 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 640 vs 40
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 27x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3026 vs 112
- 6.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 485
- 6.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 485
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 March 2014 vs 10 September 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 797 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 40 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3026 vs 112 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 485 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4200
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 372 vs 225
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 372 vs 225 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4200
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M | ATI Radeon HD 4200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3026 | 112 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 | 372 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10018 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.828 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 210.585 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.416 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.662 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.83 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4938 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4938 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 485 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1151 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M | ATI Radeon HD 4200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | RV6xx |
| Code name | GK104 | RV620 |
| Launch date | 10 March 2014 | 10 September 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 899 | 901 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 915 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 797 MHz | 500 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1152 or 640 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 40 |
| Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | yes |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| HDCP support | ||
| PCI-E 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7150M + nForce 630M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M vs
ATIRadeon HD 4200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 470M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M375X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M vs
AMDRadeon R5 340 OEM
