AMD Radeon Vega 11 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 11 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 11

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 915 MHz
• Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 57.2 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
• Around 10% higher pipelines: 704 vs 640
• Around 32% better floating-point performance: 1,830 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 485 vs 226
• Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13288 vs 10362
• Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.582 vs 22.828
• Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 371.843 vs 210.585
• Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.449 vs 28.662
• Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 248.838 vs 162.83

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M

• 2.7x more core clock speed: 797 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3048 vs 1838
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.427 vs 3.156
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4938 vs 2156
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 2475
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4938 vs 2156
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 2475

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 11
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1838 3048
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	485 226
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	13288 10362
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	41.582 22.828
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	371.843 210.585
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.156 3.427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	52.449 28.662
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	248.838 162.83
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2156 4938
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2475 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3343 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2156 4938
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2475 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3343 3340

Compare specifications (specs)