AMD Radeon Vega 11 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 11 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 11
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 57.2 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
- Around 10% higher pipelines: 704 vs 640
- Around 32% better floating-point performance: 1,830 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 vs 226
- Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13221 vs 10351
- Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.582 vs 22.828
- Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 371.843 vs 210.585
- Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.449 vs 28.662
- Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 248.838 vs 162.83
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 vs 10 March 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 915 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 57.2 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 704 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 1,830 gflops vs 1,389 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 vs 226 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13221 vs 10351 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.582 vs 22.828 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 371.843 vs 210.585 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.449 vs 28.662 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 248.838 vs 162.83 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 vs 3340 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 797 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3051 vs 1843
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.416 vs 3.156
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4938 vs 2156
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 2475
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4938 vs 2156
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 2475
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 797 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3051 vs 1843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.416 vs 3.156 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4938 vs 2156 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 vs 2475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4938 vs 2156 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 vs 2475 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 11
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega 11 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1843 | 3051 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 | 226 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13221 | 10351 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.582 | 22.828 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 371.843 | 210.585 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.156 | 3.416 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.449 | 28.662 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 248.838 | 162.83 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2156 | 4938 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2475 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2156 | 4938 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2475 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 1151 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Vega 11 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Owl | GK104 |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 | 10 March 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 903 | 904 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 915 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 797 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,830 gflops | 1,389 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 704 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 57.2 GTexel / s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | 3,540 million |
CUDA cores | 1152 or 640 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |